EDITOR: Hey, Stephenie. Thanks for coming in. I just finished Breaking Dawn.
SM: Oh, great! How'd you like it?
EDITOR: Pretty good. Much more plot than the previous three. Good work!
SM: Thanks, I was trying to actually have a storyline this time.
EDITOR: It shows. I also like how you divided the book into chunks. Gives us a chance to get into someone else's head for a while, see from a different perspective.
SM: Thanks.
EDITOR: I think we need to name these chunks, though. A good title can help so much, don't you agree?
SM: Er...yes...
EDITOR: A good title can tantalize, hint--not give too much away but still really give readers an idea of what's to come. I have some great title ideas for you.
SM: Okay! That'd be pretty helpful, I guess. Shoot.
EDITOR: All right. The first part--wait for it, this is sheer genius--I think you should call the first part "Bella Likes Sex."
SM: What?
EDITOR: "Bella Likes Sex." Isn't it perfect?
SM: Um, don't you think it's a little, uh, on the nose?
EDITOR: But that's what's so great about it! Readers know exactly what they're getting, but not too much. I mean, they don't know who Bella likes sex with.
SM: I think I'll just stick with calling it "Bella."
EDITOR: Well, your loss. Okay, part two. Part two is a little trickier. I'm toying with two options here. Let me run the first one by you: "Jacob Hates Vampires."
SM: A bit obvious for a title, isn't it?
EDITOR: Well, really, Stephenie, what else have you given me to work with here?
SM: There's more to Jacob than his hatred of vampires. Can't you do something with that?
EDITOR: Of course you're right. That leads me to my second title choice, if you don't like the first one--
SM: Yes, please.
EDITOR: Okay: "Jacob is a Jerk."
SM: What??
EDITOR: Come on, Stephenie. You've got to admit that you've written one of the most unlikable characters ever. And considering that we're actually supposed to like him anyway, this is quite a feat.
SM: I disagree. And I think there are a lot of fans that would disagree as well.
EDITOR: Really? How could they? I mean, Jacob is a character who is so full of self-reflection, which you'd think would unearth so much depth. But really, he never has any kind of self-realization. He's shallow and angst-ridden and basically, well, a jerk. Hence the title.
SM: Well, wouldn't you be? Angst-ridden and all that. Considering all he's been through.
EDITOR: Oh, probably. But I hope I'd grow, and not because of some obvious plot-contrivance, but naturally.
SM: Plot-contrivance?
EDITOR: Oh, yeah, sorry. Minor nit-picky detail there. It bothered me when Jacob--
SM: I wrote it, you don't need to tell me.
EDITOR: True. Plus, you can see it coming a mile away.
SM: Hmph.
EDITOR: Well, we obviously have some differences of opinion over part two. But I'm sure we can agree about part three.
SM: Yeah, we'll see.
EDITOR: Now, you can see I'm an advocate for those short, sound-byte titles. But part three doesn't lend itself to that easily.
SM: No?
EDITOR: No. A lot of stuff happens in part three! I mean, a lot!
SM: Thank you?
EDITOR: Indeed! Nice job, really.
SM: So, what's the problem?
EDITOR: Well, my title idea is kind of a mouthful.
SM: Let's hear it.
EDITOR: Okay. "Lots of Stuff Happens, and Then It Gets Predictable and Cheesy. (P.S. Bella Likes Sex.)"
SM: Bella does like sex. I'll give you that one. But "predictable" and "cheesy"?
EDITOR: C'mon, Steph. Think.
SM: "Cheesy"...yeah, you're right. But it's a romance at heart, gimme a break. It always has been, from the beginning.
EDITOR: Okay, I'll cave on that. But predictable, you gotta admit it's predictable.
SM: No, I don't!
EDITOR: My secretary read your manuscript and promised me that there was a great twist in it, that I'd never see where it was going. Did I, uh, did I get a different copy?
SM: No...
EDITOR: Then I'm sticking with predictable.
SM: *sigh* Can we go to press anyway?
EDITOR: Sure. You write really well! I mean that. I look forward to your next book!
Thursday, August 14, 2008
High Noon
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Hilarious! Except I was under the impression that Meyer didn't have an editor. Because if she did, wouldn't each book be at least 200 pages shorter? And wouldn't she have to think up other descriptions of Edward besides "god-like"?
I LOVE IT! Ok, I haven't read the books, but that's because I've been a little squeamish. Usually when there's a book craze out there with lots of hype, it means the book is probably not that great. (We're talking the same gazillion people who think Miley Cyrus is, like, totally the greatest singer ever!) If I ever do read the books I will not be one bit surprised if I feel the same way about them that you do. It's nice to hear another POV about the Twilight Hype Disease.
Okay, but you are famous for supposedly figuring out plot twists and the rest of us are "Really? you saw that coming?"
We know she can write well, because The Host was pretty great. So where does the talent fly off to when she writes the Twilight books?
Ha ha that's so funny. I haven't read the book yet. You're awesome!
Classic Kiersten. You are a mighty clever one! I haven't even read the book yet and I already find myself agreeing with you! Pure entertainment. Keep the reviews coming!
LOVE IT. Seriously. That just made my day.
Bebt.
HA. Maybe I'm glad I haven't read it yet. Maybe someday I will. When I have the flu and can't focus anyway. ;)
PS: Hi Kiersten!
Post a Comment